Lecture 1.
(Revelation 1:1-3)
THE
SPIRIT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT IS TAKEN UP—THE PREFACE—THE SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF
THE BOOK—WHAT THE REVELATION OF CHRIST IS—JOHN IN THE DAY OF THE LORD—THE
DERIVATION OF THE APOCALYPSE—THE VALUE AND PRECIOUSNESS OF THIS BOOK—OUR
SPECIAL STUDY DEMANDED.
Rev. 1:1-3
(Revised Text)—The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show
unto his servants that which must come to pass speedily; and he signified [it]
sending by his angel to his servant John; who attested the word of God, and the
testimony of Jesus Christ, what things soever he saw. Blessed he who readeth,
and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and observe the things which are
written in it: for the time [is] near.
It has been upon my mind, and in my heart, for a long time, to deliver a
series of special discourses upon this remarkable portion of the Holy
Scriptures; not from a conceit of superior wisdom or spiritual gifts;—not with
the vain ambition of making all mysteries plain,—nor yet out of mere curious
desire to pry into the things of the future; but out of solemn reverence for
all that God has caused to be written for our learning, with a view
conscientiously to declare the whole counsel of God, and with an earnest desire
to secure for myself and those who hear me that special benediction which is
pronounced upon them that read, hear, and keep what is written in this
prophecy.
I have delayed the commencement of this work till now, partly on account of
the bodily infirmities under which I have laboured for the past two years, and
partly because I desired first to qualify myself better by ampler
investigation, and by a more thorough mastery of the difficulties which have
hindered the success of other attempts to explain this book. And, for the same
reasons, I am unable, even now, to promise the continuation of these
discourses, except at irregular intervals. So far, however, as God shall give
me strength, I shall pursue them to their end.
I am also very sure, as God has promised his Spirit to them that ask him,
and directed those who lack wisdom to seek for it at his hands, and pronounced
all inspired writings to be "for our learning" and comfort, that it
will be profitable for all of us, in humble dependence upon Divine grace and
guidance, carefully to review what this book was meant to teach.
And may I not ask you, to give me your attention, as I proceed with these
expositions, and to unite with me in earnestly invoking God's helpful
illuminations, that we may rightly understand his solemn message to his people.
The words which I have announced for our present consideration, give us the
Divine Preface or superscription to this book. They are meant to advise the
reader as to that with which he is about to deal, and to prepare him to
appreciate what is to follow. They relate to three leading points:
I. THE SUBJECT AND CONTENTS OF THE BOOK.
II. ITS DERIVATION AND AUTHORSHIP.
III. ITS VALUE AND PRECIOUSNESS.
Let us look briefly at these several particulars.
What concerns the subject and contents of this book, I find for the most
part in the name which it gives itself. It is the common rule with Scripture
names, to express the substance of the things to which they are applied. The
name of God expresses what God is; so the names of the Lord Jesus Christ, and
all the leading names found in the Bible. Even those which the Church has
given, are often wonderfully expressive and significant. Genesis is the
generation of things; Exodus, the going forth from bondage; The
Gospel, the very heart and substance of all God's gracious
communications—the good news. And when God himself designates this book The
Revelation of Jesus Christ, we may rest assured, that it is the very
substance and kernel of the book that is expressed in this title.
What, then, are we to understand by "The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ?"
There are certain books (adopted and held sacred by the Church of Rome, which
we, however, receive only as human productions), which have a name somewhat
similar to this in sound. You find them in some Bibles, between the Old and New
Testaments, bearing the name of Apocrypha. But Apocrypha is just
the opposite of Apocalypse. Apocrypha means something that is concealed,
not set forth, not authentic; Apocalypse means something revealed,
disclosed, manifested, shown. The verb αποκαλύπτω,
means to reveal, to make manifest, to uncover to view. The noun, means a
revelation, a disclosure, an appearing, a making manifest. The Apocalypse,
or Revelation of Jesus Christ, must therefore be the revealment, manifestation,
appearing, of Jesus Christ.
Some accept the words as if they were meant to express the revealment of the
Revelation. This I take to be a mistake, and a vital mistake, as regards any
right interpretation of this book. It is not the Apocalypse which is the
subject of the disclosure. This book is not the Apocalypse of the Apocalypse,
but The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ.
And this is the key to the whole book. It is a book of which Christ is the
great subject and centre, particularly in that period of his administrations
and glory designated as the day of his uncovering, the day of his appearing. It
is not a mere prediction of divine judgments upon the wicked, and of the final
triumph of the righteous, made known by Christ; but a book of the
revelation of Christ, in his own person, offices, and future
administrations, when he shall be seen coming from heaven, as he was
once seen going into heaven. If "The Revelation of Jesus Christ"
meant nothing more than certain communications made known by Christ, I can see
no significance or propriety in affixing this title to this book, rather than
to any other books of holy Scripture. Are they not all alike the revelation of
Jesus Christ, in this sense? Does not Peter say of the inspired writers in
general, that they were moved by the Spirit of Christ which was in them? Why
then single out this particular book as "The Revelation of Jesus
Christ," when it is no more the gift of Jesus than any other inspired
book? Besides, it would be particularly strange, that this book should be so
specially designated "The Revelation of Jesus Christ" in the sense of
revelation by Christ, when the book itself declares that it was not received
from Christ, but from an angel or messenger of Christ. These
considerations alone ought to satisfy us that there is something more
distinctive and characteristic in this title than is embraced in its ordinary
acceptation. For my own part, I am perfectly convinced, from a review of the places
in which the word occurs in the New Testament, as well as from all the contents
of this particular part of it, that The Apocalypse, or Revelation of
Jesus Christ, means Jesus Christ revealed, and uncovered to mortal view;
and not merely Jesus Christ revealing, and making known hidden things to
be recorded for our learning. Let me refer to a few passages bearing upon the
case.
Paul, in his first letter to the Corinthians (1:7), speaks of
them as enriched in every spiritual gift, confirmed in the testimony of Christ,
and "waiting for the Apocalypse (την
αποκαλυψιν) the
coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." The original word here is exactly
the same as that in the text; the structure of the sentence is also much the
same; but no one mistakes its meaning for a moment. All agree that it refers to
Christ in his revelation from heaven, when he shall come in the clouds with
power and great glory. And if such is its unmistakable meaning here, why not take
it in the same sense in the text? So in Thessalonians (1:6-10) he
refers his readers to a time of rest, "when the Lord Jesus shall be
revealed from heaven (εν
τη αποκαλυψει
του Κυρἱου, literally, at
the Apocalypse of the Lord), with his mighty angels, in flaming fire,
taking vengeance on them that know not God;—when he shall come to be
glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe." No
one misunderstands what The Apocalypse of the Lord Jesus is in this passage.
Paul himself explains it to be His coming, in just such administrations
as were shown John in this book.
So again in 1
Peter 1:7, where that apostle speaks of his brethren as "in heaviness
through manifold temptations," that the trial of their faith, "being
much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried, with fire,
might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the Apocalypse (εν
αποκαλύψεν), appearing
of Jesus Christ." Also in verse 13, where
he exhorts his readers to "be sober, and hope to the end for the grace
that is to be brought unto them at the Apocalypse (εν
αποκαλύψει), the
revelation of Jesus Christ." All understand the reference in these
passages to be to the coming of Christ in the glory of his second advent, when
"every eye shall see him, and they which pierced him." We all feel
that it would be a wilful perversion of the word of God to make the
Apocalypse of Christ, in these passages, mean anything else than his personal
appearing. And the same is the fixed meaning of this phrase in every other
passage in which it is used. Even in that from Galatians (1:12), which
might seem to assign it a different signification, the idea is not simply that
of a revealer, but of one revealed by personal manifestation. Paul there avers,
that the gospel he preached was not of man; "for," says he, "I
neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the Apocalypse
(δἰ
αποκαλυψεως)
through the revelation of Jesus Christ," that is, by Christ's personal
appearance to him, as the succeeding verses show; for he straightway
proceeds to narrate that marvellous affair on the way to Damascus. What that
Apocalypse was, he on various occasions described. Before Agrippa, he
said,—"As I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief
priests, at midday, O King, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the
brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.
And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and
saying in a Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And I said, Who
art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest, but rise, and
stand upon thy feet; for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to
make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast
seen, and of those things in which I will appear unto thee."
Hence his appeal in vindication of his apostleship. "Am I not an apostle?
Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord?" (1 Cor. 9:1.) All
this shows, as conclusively as may be, that the Apocalypse of Christ, through
which he obtained at once his office and his text, was a personal
appearance, as every real Apocalypse predicted of a person must be.
With the meaning of this word thus established, what can that book be, of
which it is descriptive, but an account of the revelation of Christ in his
personal forthcoming from his present invisible estate, to receive his Bride,
judge the wicked, and set up his eternal kingdom on the earth.
With this also agrees the statement of John as to the circumstances under
which he came to the knowledge of the things which he narrates. He says he
"was in Spirit in the Lord's day," in which he beheld what he
afterwards wrote. What is meant by this Lord's day? Some answer, Sunday—the
first day of the week; but I am not satisfied with this explanation. Sunday
belongs indeed to the Lord, but the Scriptures nowhere call it "the Lord's
day." None of the Christian writings, for 100 years after Christ, ever
call it "the Lord's day." But there is a "Day of the Lord"
largely treated of by prophets, apostles, and fathers, the meaning of which is
abundantly clear and settled. It is that day in which, Isaiah says, men shall
hide in the rocks for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty;—the
day which Joel describes as the day of destruction from the Almighty, when the
Lord shall roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem, and the
heavens and the earth shall shake;—the day to which the closing chapter of
Malachi refers as the day that shall burn as an oven, and in which the Sun of
Righteousness shall arise with healing in his wings;—the day which Paul
proclaimed from Mars' Hill as that in which God will judge the world,
concerning which he so earnestly exhorted the Thessalonians, and which was not
to come until after a great apostasy from the faith, and the ripening of the
wicked for destruction;—the day in the which, Peter says, the heavens shall be
changed, the elements melt, the earth burn, and all present orders of things
give way to new heavens and a new earth;—even "the day for which all other
days were made." And in that day I understand John to say, he in some
sense was. In the mysteries of prophetic rapport, which the Scriptures describe
as "in Spirit," and which Paul declared inexplicable, he was
caught out of himself, and out of his proper place and time, and stationed amid
the stupendous scenes of the great day of God, and made to see the actors in
them, and to look upon them transpiring before his eyes, that he might write
what he saw, and give it to the Churches.
This is what I understand by his being "in Spirit in the Lord's
day." I can see no essential difference between ἡ Κυριακη
ἡμερα—the Lord's day,—and ἡ ἡμερα
Κυριου—the day of the Lord. They are
simply the two forms for signifying the same relations of the same things. And
if John was thus mystically down among the scenes of the last day, and has
written only what he says he has written, that is "things that he saw;"
it cannot be otherwise but that in dealing with the contents of this book we
are dealing with what relates preeminently to the great Apocalypse and Epiphany
of our Lord, when he cometh to judge the world in righteousness.
And when we come to consider the actual contents of this book, we find them
harmonizing exactly with this understanding of its title. It takes as its chief
and unmistakable themes what other portions of the Scriptures assign to the
great day of the Lord. It is nothing but Apocalypse from beginning to end.
First we have the Apocalypse of Christ in his relation to the earthly Churches,
and his judgment of them; then the Apocalypse of his relation to the glorified
Church, and the marshalling of them for his forthcoming to judge the world;
then the Apocalypse of his relation to the scenes of the judgment, as they are
manifested on earth under the opening of the seals, the prophesying of the
witnesses, and the fall of Babylon; then the Apocalypse of his actual
manifestation to the world in the battle of the great day of God Almighty, the
establishment of his kingdom, and the investiture of the saints in their future
sovereignties; and finally the Apocalypse of his relation to the final act of
judgment, the destruction of death and the grave, and the introduction of the
final estate of a perfected Redemption. What, indeed, is all this, but just
what was foretold by all the prophets, by Christ himself, and by all his
apostles, as pertaining to The Day of the Lord? Verily, this book is but the
rehearsal, in another and ampler manner, of what all the Scriptures tell us
about the last day and the eternal judgment. It is preeminently The Apocalypse
and Epiphany of Jesus Christ.
II. Notice now its derivation and authorship. The text represents it
as the gift of God to Christ. It is called "The Apocalypse of Jesus
Christ, which God gave unto him." Some understand this gift in the sense
of signified, made known to; and so put themselves under the necessity
of explaining how this could be without compromising our Lord's Divinity. This
is the first difficulty engendered by the departure from the proper scriptural
meaning of the word Apocalypse. People take it as denoting a piece of
information, and so represent Christ in a state of ignorance respecting the
sublimest results of his mediatorship until after his ascension into heaven.
The incongruities of such an acceptation should teach men better. The
Apocalypse of Christ is the future reappearance of Christ, clothed with the
honours and crowned with the triumphs which are to characterize that
forthcoming, and not the mere knowledge or description of these things. And it
is that Apocalypse, with all its glorious concomitants and results, that God
has, in covenant, given to Christ;—given to him as the crowning reward of his
mediatorial work, as the Scriptures everywhere teach.
The promise of the victory of the woman's seed involved this gift. Hannah's
song speaks of it as strength and exaltation which the Lord bestoweth upon his
anointed. God's promise to David of a son whose kingdom is to be established
forever embraces it. It is the great theme of the second Psalm, where God says
to his son: "I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the
uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession—thou shalt break them with a
rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel." It is
in Isaiah's pictures of Messiah, in Jeremiah's prophecies, in the words of the
annunciation to Mary, in Christ's own parables, and in all the writings of the
Apostles. Because Christ "made himself of no reputation, and took
upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men, and
humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross,
God hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name,
that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and
things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should
confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." We are
told that there was joy set before Christ as the reward of his sufferings and
death, and that it was "for the joy that was set before him, he
endured the cross, despising the shame." And whatever else may be included
in that exaltation or that joy, highest and greatest of all is a future
Apocalypse, when "the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy
angels with him, and he shall sit upon the throne of his glory." This,
then, is what God "gave to Jesus Christ," in promise, when he
commenced his work, in its earnest, when he raised him from the dead and
received him into glory; and thus gave what constitutes the substance of
this book.
But as the full manifestation of this endowment of Christ is still future,
and it is important for his followers to be well informed concerning it, the
blessed Saviour, after his ascension, took measures to have the facts
becomingly communicated to his servants on earth. "And he sent and
signified [the same] by his angel." In stating who this
angel was, I do not venture to be specific. His own account of himself to John,
was, "I am thy fellow-servant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of
them which keep the sayings of this book" (Rev. 22:9). From
this, it has been thought, that he was one of the old prophets, or some one
standing in a closer relation to Christ and the Church than can be affirmed of
angels proper. It is also somewhat confirmative of this view, that whilst the
angels are called "ministering spirits" (Heb. 1:14), they
are not called "God's servants," nor fellows of the prophets and
apostles, as in the case before us. Let it suffice, however, for us to know,
that it was some heavenly messenger, commissioned by the Lord Jesus in glory,
to come and make known these apocalyptic wonders.
Some have found difficulty in tracing the agency of this angel in the book
itself. "It is remarkable," says one, "that this angel does not
appear as the imparter of the visions until chapter seventeen." This would
imply, that what God here says about the derivation of this book is only true
with respect to a very small fraction of it. I cannot agree thus to stint and
stultify the words of the Almighty. The proper explanation of the office of the
angel is to be found in the words signified and saw. The word
rendered signified, taken in connection with the fact that the things
signified were matters of contemplation by means of the eyes, can denote
nothing else than an actual picturing of those scenes—a making of them pass
before the view the same as if they were really transpiring. The office of the
angel, then, as I take it, was, to form the connection between John's senses or
imagination and the things which he was to describe, making to pass in review
before him what was only afterwards to take place in fact. How this was done, I
cannot say: but as the devil could take Jesus to a high mountain, and show him
at one view "all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them," I
am sure that it falls sufficiently within the sphere of angelic natures thus to
picture things to man; and that when commissioned of the Lord for the purpose,
no good angel is wanting in ability to be the instrument in making John see
whatever visions he describes in this book. And when God himself tells me that
what is here set forth was thus signified to John, I will persist in
referring every one of the visions, with all that he says he saw and heard, to
the intervention of this angelic agent, and believe that in all sacred things
we are vastly more dependent upon angelic ministrations than we know or can
understand. "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to
minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?" (Heb. 1:14.)
But there is still another link in the chain of agencies through which the
great things of this book have been made known to men. Given of God, sent by
Christ, signified by an angel, they were finally recorded by John, and by him
communicated to the Churches.
Nor need we be in doubt as to what John this is. The text describes him as
that "John, who attested the word of God, and the testimony of Jesus
Christ." And who is it that the Churches from the beginning have known as
the attestor of the Logos, or Word of God, and of the testimony which
Christ gave, but John the Apostle, the beloved disciple? Turn to the Gospel by
John, and see whether it be not wholly taken up with exactly these things. The
first chapter gives the only full account which the Scriptures contain
respecting the pre-existence of the Logos, or Word, in the Godhead, and
the sameness of that Word with him who was born of Mary, tabernacled in the
flesh, and was called Jesus of Nazareth. Was not this bearing "record of
the Word of God?" Do we not find another summary of the same testimony in
the first chapter of his first epistle? What else does he mean by the account
which he gives of his testimony, when he says, "That which was from the
beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have
looked upon, and our hands have handled of the Word of life, declare we unto
you? "Are not both his first and second epistles but arguments, against
various evil spirits which were gone abroad, that Jesus is the Word of God, the
only Christ, the Son of God, and that all who deny this are liars and Antichrist? And in reference to the great body of his
Gospel, does he not himself say, "These things are written, that ye might
believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might
have life through his name?" Does not all this make out for John a
particular distinction as the apostle "who attested the Word of God, and
the testimony of Jesus Christ?"
Some say that it was not John the Apostle who wrote this book, but another
John, contemporaneous with the apostle. But it is not yet conclusively proven
that there was such a John other than the apostle; and, if there even was,
there is not the first tittle of evidence that he had ever distinguished
himself for his record concerning the Logos, or concerning the testimonies,
which he himself saw, by which Christ announced himself as the Messiah and the
Son of God. I conclude, therefore, Upon the solid basis of God's own identification
of the author of this book, that it was the Apostle John who wrote it.
Such also has been the conviction of the best portions of the Church from
the beginning. For the first two centuries the universal Christian testimony
ascribed the Apocalypse to the pen of "that disciple whom Jesus
loved." In the third century, out of a desire to get rid of its authority
for certain unpalatable doctrines, there were some who ascribed it to
Cerinthus, a reputed heretic of the first century. But, "if the common
consent of all antiquity is to overturn the heady rashness of well-meaning but
inconsiderate men of evil name; then we have the most satisfactory evidence
that this book was written by John the Apostle, and believed by the Church to
be most fully inspired. Justin Martyr, Irenĉus, Tertullian, Clemens
Alexandrinus, Origen, Jerome, Augustine, and a continued stream of Orthodox
authority to our day, from the age next to that in which it was written, concur
in the reception, the admiration, and the observance of this book."
Such, then, is the exalted source and derivation of this wonderful
production. It takes its origin in God's covenant gift to Jesus Christ as the
reward of triumph and glory for his humiliation and obedience unto death. It
was sent by the loving Saviour from heaven, in the charge of an angelic
messenger, to be shown to John. And by the hands of "that disciple whom
Jesus loved," thus visited in his lonely exile—emblem of that consolation
in distress with which this book has ever irradiated the dark and gloomy days
of the Church,— was traced out in the language of mortals, and delivered over
as Christ's last message to his people on earth.
III. A word or two now as to the value and preciousness of this book.
A gift which the Great God thinks a befitting honour and compensation to Christ
for all his great deeds of love and condescension; a thing which the blessed
Lord in heaven esteemed of sufficient moment to be made known by a special
embassage, which holy angels considered it an honour to be permitted to
signify, and which the tenderness of the disciple of love so conscientiously
recorded for the comfort and admonition of the people of God in every age,
certainly is not a thing of trifling significance. If we are interested in the
story of the manger and the cross; if we can draw strength for our prayers and
hopes by invoking Christ by the mystery of his incarnation, fasting,
temptation, agony, and bloody sweat; if we find it such a precious treasure to
our souls to come into undoubting sympathy with the scenes of his humiliation
and grief; what should be our appreciation of this book, which treats of the
fruits of those sufferings, and tells only of that wronged Saviour's glory and
triumphs, and shows us our Lord enthroned in majesty, riding prosperously, and
scattering to his ransomed ones the crowns and regencies of empire which shall
never perish, and celestial blessednesses without number and above all thought!
"All Scripture," indeed, "is profitable, for doctrine, for
reproof, for correction and instruction in righteousness, that the man of God
may be thoroughly furnished unto all good works;" but there are some
portions more especially significant and precious, and proper attention to
which is fraught with particular advantages. Of this sort is this book of the
Revelation of Jesus Christ. What saith the text?—"Blessed is he that
readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things
which are written therein." The same is repeated in chapter 22:7,—"Blessed
is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book." Of course,
the more we learn and know of Christ, the better it will be for us, if the
spirit of faith and obedience be in our hearts, and this book is preeminently
the Revelation of Christ. It sets out our blessed Lord, and draws away the veil
which hangs between us and him, and lifts us up into the sublimest things of
heaven. It shows us how the Son of man has been rewarded by the Father, and
what works and offices are assigned unto that meek Lamb. It shows us the
history of our Saviour's person, all-glorious and exalted, and his great
ministrations in the Church and in the universe, until his coming again from
the throne and in the power of the Father, with all the armies of heaven with
him. Above all does it dwell upon that great Apocalypse, the condition in which
it will find the world, what it will bring to his prepared and waiting saints,
what it will inflict upon lukewarm believers, infidels, and evildoers, and what
will be the character and issues of that great day of God Almighty. It tells
what the Church will be till Christ comes, what it will be in that period of
dreadful trial, what Satan and his children will attempt, and how the Lord
Jesus shall trample them down under the glory of his power, raise the dead,
renew the world, and set up forever his blessed reign in it. It shows us what
will be the final triumphs and rewards of the saints for their present griefs
and toils; what will be the future of our world; how it is to be renewed,
cleansed, beautified, and invested with heavenly excellencies; and how the
light, and knowledge and glory of God is to become its eternal possession.
It is always important for us to be forwarned with regard to the future. It
is our nature to be forecasting, and it is one of the necessities of our
well-being to be able to anticipate with accuracy, at least with regard to the
leading things that shall concern us. He who does not shape the conduct of
to-day with reference to some end foreseen or calculated on for some other day,
is a mere fool and madman, whether it be in the things of God, or in the things
of the world. And in this book we are certified beforehand of what God hath
determined concerning the future—what the devout may hope for, what the
indifferent and unbelieving have to fear, wherein the true safety and
consolation of man is to be found, what tribulations are to come upon the
world, and what birth-pangs are yet to be passed through to reach that Golden
Age of which prophets and poets of all nations and times have spoken.
There is also a peculiar efficacy and power in the doctrine of Christ's
speedy return. Like a magnet, it lifts the heart of the believer out of the
world, and out of his low self, and enables him to stand with Moses on the
mount, and transfigures him with the rays of blessed hope and promise which
stream upon him in those sublime heights. It is the most animating and most sanctifying
subject in the Bible. It is the soul's serenest light amid the darkness and
trials of earth. And the great end and aim of this book is to set forth this
doctrine. The things of which it treats, are things touching the Apocalypse of
Jesus Christ, and which it describes as "things which must shortly come to
pass." The impending Advent is the theme which pervades it from its
commencement to its close. And just in proportion as he who is awake to the
great truth of the Saviour's speedy coming, and is engaged in waiting and
preparing himself accordingly, is a better man, and in a safer condition, and
really more happy, than the half-christian and the lukewarm;—in that same
proportion is he who reads, hears and keeps the words of this prophecy blessed
beyond all other people. This book, at least its subject-matter, thus becomes
to him an instrument of security and attainment to save him from surprise when
his Lord cometh, and from the tribulations which shall try the indifferent; as
well as a passport to admit him to the marriage supper of the Lamb, and to the
highest awards of eternity. Precious book! and happy they who study it!
Nor can I close without remarking how all this plucks up, and crushes to
atoms, those erroneous and mischievous notions entertained by many, that there
is nothing useful in prophetic studies. To say nothing of the duty of giving
heed to what God has thought it important to record, or of the folly of seeing
only peril in trying to understand what the Spirit of God has inspired for our
learning and consolation, what man is he, who, in the face of this text, and
its outspoken benediction, will venture to denounce investigation into sacred
prophecy? What if it is often dark and mysterious? The darker and more
difficult, the greater the reason for earnest examination. Be the obscurity and
mystery what it may, God says, "Blessed is he that readeth, and they that
hear the words, and keep those things which are written." What if this
book of Revelation is the fullest of all of dark things and perplexing
mysteries? It is then a book which above all needs our most solemn and studious
attention. Nay, it is concerning this book especially that God pronounces this
blessedness upon the devout and obedient inquirer.
Some tell us that what is yet future ought not to be examined into till
after it has come to pass. I can hardly realize that this is seriously meant.
Yet I have had it argued to me, even in Jerusalem itself. Do such persons not
perceive that they thus judge God, and Christ, and the sent angel of Christ,
and John the beloved disciple of Christ, and join issue with the God of truth
as to the correctness of his utterances? I find also that those who so argue
are prone to insist that the day of death is the same as Christ's coming. Do
they then mean that a man is only to study the predictions of that coming after
he is dead? Out upon such doctrine as this! Away with such presumptuous
deprivation of the Church of the precious legacy left her by her ascended Lord!
I will not for a moment regard that as wrong and dangerous which the Lord
himself hath pronounced blessed. Jesus knew what he was about when he
sent this book to be shown unto his servants. He understood his own words when
he said and repeated: Blessed is he that reads and he that keeps what is in
this book. And I will insist that it is to be studied. As Christ said to the
writer of it, so he says to all his ministers, and all his people, in all time:
"Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book." It is an open
book, and meant to be ever kept open to the view of the Church from that time
forward to the end. Woe, then, to the man who undertakes to draw away
God's people from it, or to warn them against looking into it! He takes from
the Church, which has now been these 2000 years among the dashing waves, the
chart by which above all Christ meant she should be guided, and wherein she may
best see whither she is bearing, what are her perils, and where her course of
safety lies! He undertakes to seal what God has said should not be sealed! He
not only "takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy,"
(which who does, "God shall take away his part out of the book of life,
and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this
book,") but seeks to take away the book itself!
And the more dangerous and reprehensible is such a course, now that
"the time is near." Nearly two thousand years ago, it was said of the
things herein written, that they must speedily come to pass. These records were
from the first pressed upon the study of the Church by the solemn consideration
that the period of their fulfilment was rapidly approaching. But if this
argument was of force then, how much more now?
Standing, then, as we do, upon the very margin of the great Apocalypse, by
all the solemnities with which it is to be accompanied, I not only invite and
recommend, but conjure Christians, as they hope to be present at the marriage
supper of the Lamb, not to put this precious book from them, or to forgo
the faithful study of its contents.
The Lord open our hearts to its teachings, and make us partakers of the
blessings it foretells!
—Apocalypse, The